Guest | Register | Login
Won't get fooled again   31 October 2008
Pam and I don't have a UK satellite dish, we decided that in order to help our French we would watch only French terrestrial TV. We have worked pretty hard at it, and made some progress. However, we do have a small treat each week on Sunday when TF1 broadcasts the American crime series show 'CSI Las Vegas' in English. The shows theme music is a track from The Who entitled 'Won't get fooled again'. Presumably picking up on the way the storyline uses a forensic examination of the evidence to prove guilt or innocence. 

I am reminded of this today, the anniversary of an interesting radio broadcast. Seventy years ago Orson Welles created panic and mass hysteria on the East Coast of the USA with his broadcast of the 'War of the Worlds'. After the introduction, the program continued with a weather report and then dance music. These normal events were suddenly interrupted by a series of alarming reports about aliens landing in New York.

People were gripped by the escalating and increasingly urgent news  - sitting on the edge of their seats as events unfolded, they were exposed to urgent, panic stricken voices and ominous sound effects. Despite the fact that they were warned about this during the introduction (and 40 minutes into the program) thousands of people were frightened and some reportedly fled their homes - heading for the hills.

Of course we would not be fooled like that today - would we? We are more sophisticated and would calmly examine the evidence - wouldn't we? Maybe not - Naomi Klein's research into The Shock Doctrine suggests otherwise. Remember the last movie that made you cry or frightened or angry. Did you perhaps forget for a moment that it was just a movie?

No, we would not get fooled again.

Did you read about Ross and Brand behaving like silly teenagers, shame really, but at least we got people to apologise and resign. Lower down the news reports tonight you might notice that three independent witnesses have given the lie to the police story about the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, one witness even thought the police were the terrorists. They were witnesses that three years ago de Menezes was murdered in cold blood without warning.

But at least Jonathan Ross has been suspended for three months.

.... won't get fooled again.


Posted by Nicholas Moore    12:52:03 am
3  Comments for this post (now closed)

      venika  commented...

Good blog this month - although it is a pity Jonathan Ross did not get the sack, BBC should have its head examined for paying £6 million a year for him.  At least Lesley Douglas, was decent enough to resign.


   
Posted at 4:00:51 pm on 9 February 2009           
     
      chris  commented...

Good blog. Ah yes - Woss and Brand (wrong and bland?) - I have long been mystified by their popularity - much like certain other members of the State...

I was pretty aghast at the Menezes case eye-witness statements. We've been waiting for years to hear this evidence and meanwhile being fed many arguments as to why we needed to surrender yet more civil liberties to combat terror, how wonderful a job the bumbling Blair twins had done and how much crime had been cut...

Only to discover that we've been mislead and violent crime has risen, the police behaved like terrorists, the surveillence officer(s) falsified their statements, and that the loss of our liberties has been in vain!

Does this mean that Russel Brand has more dignity and respect for the public than the Blair brothers? At least Brand acknowledgd the error of his ways, apologised and resigned. Real or not, this implies a certain dawning awareness and reflective humility. If only politicians (elected and otherwise) could be held thus accountable. Oh wait, isn't that what a democracy is supposed to do? 


   
Posted at 4:00:51 pm on 9 February 2009           
     
      nicolette  commented...

This is good, Dad. I find it alarming how easily distracted we are from really important events!! x
   
Posted at 4:00:51 pm on 9 February 2009           
     



All works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License, unless otherwise specified or a reference to an external source is provided.